Legal
-
OpenText Discovery Project Manager Spotlight
The success of any eDiscovery project — whether it’s a contentious litigation or fast-moving internal investigation — ultimately rests on…
Read more -
Where there’s smoke…look for fire!
Trade secrets are immensely valuable, and warrant every ounce of protection that can be mustered. And some industries—such as pharmaceutical,…
Read more -
High-efficiency review enables client to meet short deadlines, reduces costs
Our client, a global corporation, was facing an investigation by a government agency into alleged price fixing. The regulators believed…
Read more -
Breaking up the family: Reviewing on a document level is more efficient
Lawyers have been reviewing document families as a collective unit since well before the advent of technology-assisted review (TAR). They…
Read more -
Are people the weakest link in technology-assisted review?
In mid-October, 2018, our friend Michael Quartararo wrote a post for Above the Law asking whether people were the weakest link…
Read more -
OpenText Discovery Release 16 EP5 raises the bar for legal technology
OpenText™ Discovery serves a broad and diverse legal market with a range of solutions. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw and Pittman leverage…
Read more -
How can I use TAR 2.0 for investigations?
Across the legal landscape, lawyers search for documents for many different reasons. Technology-assisted review (TAR) 1.0 systems were primarily used…
Read more -
Legal holds for smart people: What is a legal hold?
Our judicial system is firmly rooted on the belief that parties to litigation should share documents and other information prior…
Read more -
Common eDiscovery error #5: Blind dates
Often, you want to limit a search to a specified date range. Sounds easy enough. But like so much in…
Read more
